Items

• 

  Do Cover Crops Impact Labile C More Than Total C? Data Synthesis

  The potential of cover crops (CC) to increase soil organic C (SOC) concentration can be inconsistent, but labile SOC is considered to be more sensitive to management than total SOC. This leads to two questions: Do CCs impact labile SOC more than total SOC? Do CCs increase labile SOC more rapidly than total SOC? This review compares CC impacts on labile and total SOC based on CC studies reporting both parameters up to Dec 31, 2022. Labile and total SOC concentrations were measured in 31 CC study locations. Cover crops increased labile SOC concentration in 58% (18 of 31) and had no effect in 42% (13 of 31) of locations, suggesting CCs do not increase labile SOC in all cases. Within the 18 locations, CCs increased labile SOC without increasing total SOC only in 19% (6 of 31 locations), while in the rest (12 of 31) of locations, CCs increased both labile and total SOC. Thus, CCs increased labile SOC more rapidly than total SOC only in one-fifth of cases. Also, the few studies that monitored changes in labile SOC with time found CCs do not always increase labile more rapidly than total SOC. In the 12 locations where CCs increased both labile and total SOC, CCs increased labile SOC by 54 ± 30% and total SOC by 23 ± 10%, indicating CCs can increase labile SOC by about two times compared with total SOC in some locations. Increased CC biomass production and reduced residue decomposition can increase labile SOC. Overall, CCs increase labile SOC in most cases but may not always increase labile SOC more rapidly than total SOC although more CC studies monitoring changes in SOC pools with time are needed to better understand CC impacts on SOC fractions under different CC management scenarios and climatic conditions.
• 

  Measuring the stability of soil organic carbon in Arenosols in the Senegalese Groundnut Basin

  Soil organic carbon (SOC) contributes to agrosystem productivity. Understanding how farming practices implemented by smallholders affect the levels and distribution of SOC in carbon (C) pools with different stabilities is essential in sub-Saharan Arenosols where SOC mineralization is intense. The stability of SOC was studied by thermal (Therm-C), physical (particulate organic matter >50 μm, POM-C and fine soil fractions <50 μm, FF-C), chemical (permanganate-oxidizable carbon, POX-C) and biological (mineralizable C, Min-C) approaches. Soil samples were collected at depths of 0–10 and 10–30 cm in cultivated fields (out- or home-fields) without any input, with millet residues, amended with manure, or with household organic wastes. Globally, average SOC contents were low (<6 g C kg-1). The variability in SOC and C pool contents was sensitive to field management. The different approaches to measuring the stability of SOC did not measure the same fraction of SOC. POM-C and Therm-C were correlated and both explained Min-C similarly, thus suggesting that in these sandy soils, POM-C or Therm-C probably measured comparable properties of the stability of C. The lack of relationships between POX-C and other pools suggested that POX-C encompassed a different nature of SOC while providing complementary information on the biogeochemical stability of SOC.
• 

  Post-agricultural restoration of soil organic carbon pools across a climate gradient

  Post-agricultural natural restoration is a worldwide strategy for eco-environmental sustainability. However, it is unclear how it affects soil organic carbon (SOC) pools and composition among soil types across climate gradient. Here, we investigated 23-year post-agricultural restorations of SOC in three soils: Luvic Phaeozem, Calcaric Cambisol and Ferralic Cambisol typical for mid-temperate, warm-temperate and subtropical zones, respectively. Six SOC fractions with different protection mechanisms (non-protected, physically, chemically, biochemically, physico-chemically and physico-biochemically) were separated. Compared with pre-restoration in 1990, post-agricultural restoration rebuilt SOC similarly (+68–+91%) among the three soils despite of different SOC background. Compared with continuous cultivation, post-agricultural restoration increased total SOC pools in all the three soils (+33–+60%) mainly because of the increments of non-protected pool (coarse particulate organic C, cPOC). However, the pure physically, chemically, and biochemically protected SOC fractions were less sensitive to post-agricultural restoration. The physico-biochemically protected SOC was hampered by restoration in the two temperate soils but remained stable in the subtropical soil, suggesting a divergent self-restoring trend. Positive correlations of the total SOC and most fractions with wetness (precipitation/temperature ratio) demonstrated the climate dependency of SOC. In conclusion, post-agricultural natural restoration builds up SOC pool mainly due to the cPOC increment and shifts SOC composition towards more easily available C in three soils across the climatic gradient.