Items
Subject is exactly
Land use change
-
Belowground C sequestrations response to grazing exclusion in global grasslands: Dynamics and mechanisms
Globally, grazing exclusion is a widely implemented management strategy for restoring degraded grassland ecosystems and sequestering carbon (C). However, there is limited understanding regarding the temporal responses and underlying factors influencing ecosystem C stocks following grazing exclusion. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive synthesis of data from 199 independent experiments (454 pairwise observations) to analyze responses of plant and soil C stocks to grazing exclusion across four distinct grassland ecosystems (desert, typical, meadow, and alpine) in the globe. We found that rates of change in plant biomass C stocks and soil organic C stocks exponentially or rationally decreased with years since enclosure. Grazing exclusion generally enhanced aboveground biomass C in plants, while its effects on C stocks of belowground biomass and soil were more contingent upon various factors, such as climate, initial levels of C stocks, and grazing exclusion duration. Furthermore, the responses of C stocks of plant biomass and soil to livestock grazing cessation tend to stabilize over time, with equilibrium typically reaching after approximately 40 years, while soil C sequestration responses exhibited a lagged pattern compared to plant biomass C. Our results underscored the effectiveness of grazing exclusion as an effective strategy to enhance C stocks in regions characterized by low C content and non-water limited conditions. We propose that grazing exclusion for 1–5 years was the best restoration time for typical, meadow and alpine grasslands. Given the limited effects of grazing exclusion on soil organic C stocks of desert types, grazing exclusion might not be an effective measure to increase the soil organic C stocks in water-limited areas like desert grasslands. -
Do agrosystems change soil carbon and nutrient stocks in a semiarid environment?
Ecological processes, such as net primary production, root system development, organic matter mineralization, nutrient removal and fertilizer application interfere in gains and losses of C and nutrients (N, P, K, Ca and Mg) in soils. Herein, we studied how five rainfed livestock and four irrigated agricultural systems affected soil C and nutrient stocks in a semi-arid environment. Soil concentrations, stocks, gains and losses of the nine land-uses were compared to those of the preserved native deciduous forest (Caatinga) along the top 1 m soil layer. Open Caatinga used as pasture, gliricidia and leucaena fields maintained the stocks of most nutrients. The shallower roots of buffel grass and prickly pear led to C (7 and 18%) and N (7 and 20%, respectively) losses, and P, Ca and Mg accumulations in the deeper layers. Irrigated crops reduced soil C and N stocks. C losses in irrigated maize and beans fields (23%) were lower than in rainfed fields in the region, while those in mango fields were large (70 and 66%). Fertilization in beans and grapes increased soil P and K stocks. Knowledge of stock changes allows proper system management to reduce the negative impacts of land-use change and promote sustainable production.