Items

• 

  Are carbon-storing soils more sensitive to climate change? A laboratory evaluation for agricultural temperate soils

  A range of agroecological practices allow to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, which makes a positive impact on climate change mitigation and soil health, but the permanence of this additional SOC storage can be questioned, in particular in a climate change context. Increased temperatures, accentuated evaporation of terrestrial water and increased atmosphere moisture content are anticipated, resulting in more frequent droughts and heavy precipitation events. Understanding the SOC dynamics and assessing the sensitivity of carbon mineralization to these climatic events is necessary to anticipate future carbon losses in terrestrial ecosystems. To this respect, it seems relevant to investigate carbon-storing soils as increased carbon mineralization induced by climate change may limit the carbon storing potential in agricultural soils. Thus, we evaluated the sensitivity of SOC mineralization to increased temperature, decreased soil moisture and drying-rewetting cycles using soils from long-term field experiments. We performed an incubation experiment on topsoil (0–30 cm) samples from temperate luvisols that had been under 20 years under conservation agriculture (CA), organic agriculture (ORG) and conventional agriculture (CON-LC) at the La Cage experiment, and under organic waste products (OWPs) applications in QualiAgro experiment, including biowaste composts (BIOW), residual municipal solid waste composts (MSW), farmyard manure (FYM) and conventional agriculture without organic inputs (CON-QA). Soil samples were incubated in the lab for 3 months under different temperature conditions (20, 28 and 35 °C) or under different moisture conditions (matric potential: pF1.5; pF 2.5 and pF 4.2) or under several dry (pF 4.2)-wet (pF 1.5) cycles (DWC). The results shown that, whatever the agricultural practices, soil moisture regime and temperature significantly affect the SOC mineralization. Overall, the DWC did not stimulate soil carbon mineralization relative to wet controls (pF1.5 and pF2.5). Whatever the soil moisture regime and temperature, specific carbon mineralization was similar between agricultural practices at La Cage, while at QualiAgro, specific carbon mineralization was lower in soils receiving organic waste products (OWPs) compared to the baseline soil. These results suggest a strong carbon stabilization by OWPs in soils as assessed by laboratory incubation experiments. Within each long-term experiment, we observed no significant difference between the carbon-storing soils (CA, ORG, MSW, FYM and BIOW) and their respective baseline soils (CON-LC and CON-QA) in the delta SOC mineralized whatever the soil moisture regime. The Q10 also indicated no significant difference between carbon-storing soils and their respective baseline soils. These results indicate that the SOC mineralization in carbon-storing soils had a similar sensitivity to the soil moisture regime and temperature as the baseline ones. Hence, the implementation of these agroecological practices appears beneficial for climate change mitigation, even in the context of extreme climatic events.
• 

  Maximizing soil organic carbon stocks under cover cropping: insights from long-term agricultural experiments in North America

  Cover crops are widely advocated for increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) levels, thereby benefiting soil health improvement and climate change mitigation. Few regional-scale studies have robustly explored SOC stocks under cover cropping, due to limited long-term experiments. We used the unique experimental data from the North American Project to Evaluate Soil Health Measurements conducted in 2019 to address this issue. This study included 19 agricultural research sites with 36 pairs of cover cropping established between 1896 and 2014. Explanatory variables related to site-specific environmental conditions and management practices were collected to identify and prioritize contributing factors that affect SOC stocks with cover crops, by coupling the Boruta algorithm and structural equation modeling. Overall, cover crops significantly (P < 0.05) improved several indicators of soil health, including greater SOC (concentration: +8%; stock: +7%), total nitrogen (+8%), water-stable aggregates (+15%), and potential carbon mineralization (+34%), on average, compared to no cover crop control. Likewise, on average, cover crops sequestered SOC 3.55 Mg C ha-1 (0–15 cm depth), with a sequestration rate of 0.24 Mg C ha-1 yr-1. In addition, we found climate (Hargreaves climatic moisture deficit) was important in explaining the variation of SOC stocks with cover crops, followed by soil properties (e.g., soil clay content). In terms of management practices, cover crop type had a significant positive (0.36) effect on SOC stocks, with non-legumes showing a greater impact, compared to legumes and mixtures. Crop rotational diversity also had a positive (0.28) effect on SOC accumulation. Our findings suggested that integrating non-legume cover crops into diverse crop rotation is likely to be a promising strategy to maximize SOC stocks with cover crops across North America.
• 

  Drivers of the amount of organic carbon protected inside soil aggregates estimated by crushing: A meta-analysis

  Given the importance of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and their dynamics in the regulation of climate change, understanding the mechanisms of SOC protection from decomposition is crucial. It is recognized that soil aggregates can provide effective protection of organic carbon from microbial decomposition. Currently, there is no systematic method for estimating the amount of protected carbon within aggregates. However, differences between CO2 emissions from incubation of intact versus crushed aggregates have been widely used as a proxy for SOC physical protection within aggregates. There is no global analysis on this type of experiment yet, nor on the drivers of the amount of SOC physically protected in soils. Using a meta-analysis including 165 pairs of observations from 22 studies encompassing a variety of ecosystems, climate and soil types, we investigated the crushing effects on cumulative carbon mineralization from laboratory incubation experiments. The aggregates were initially separated by either wet sieving or dry sieving before dry crushing. Our results indicated that aggregate crushing led on average to +31 % stimulation of carbon mineralization compared with intact aggregates, which represented 0.65 to 1.01 % of total SOC. This result suggests the mineralization of a previously protected pool of labile organic carbon. The linear regression analysis showed that the crushing effect on carbon mineralization depended on soil characteristics (carbon content, clay content and pH) as well as on aggregate size. Crushing aggregates stimulated carbon mineralization relative to control, up to +63 % in large aggregates (>10 mm), +38 % in large macro-aggregates (2–8 mm), +14 % in small macro-aggregates (0.25–2 mm) and +54 % in micro-aggregates (<0.25 mm). Within each aggregate size-class, the crushing effect depended on the crushing intensity. The destruction of aggregates to <0.05 mm size had a greater effect on carbon mineralization (+130–133 %) than the destruction of aggregates to >2 mm (+3 to 40 %), < 2 mm (+58 to 62 %) and < 0.25 mm (+32 to 62 %) sizes regardless of the initial aggregate size. These results suggest that macroaggregates (>0.25 mm) are less protective than microaggregates (<0.25 mm). Our dataset also show that soil physicochemical characteristics and experimental conditions influenced more the amount of protected SOC than land use and management. Contrary to our expectations the crushing effect was not affected by tillage practices nor land use. Standardizing the experimental conditions of aggregate crushing and subsequent incubation is needed to assess and compare the amount of physically protected SOC in diverse soils, and then to better understand the processes and drivers of SOC protection inside aggregates.