Items

• 

  Do agrosystems change soil carbon and nutrient stocks in a semiarid environment?

  Ecological processes, such as net primary production, root system development, organic matter mineralization, nutrient removal and fertilizer application interfere in gains and losses of C and nutrients (N, P, K, Ca and Mg) in soils. Herein, we studied how five rainfed livestock and four irrigated agricultural systems affected soil C and nutrient stocks in a semi-arid environment. Soil concentrations, stocks, gains and losses of the nine land-uses were compared to those of the preserved native deciduous forest (Caatinga) along the top 1 m soil layer. Open Caatinga used as pasture, gliricidia and leucaena fields maintained the stocks of most nutrients. The shallower roots of buffel grass and prickly pear led to C (7 and 18%) and N (7 and 20%, respectively) losses, and P, Ca and Mg accumulations in the deeper layers. Irrigated crops reduced soil C and N stocks. C losses in irrigated maize and beans fields (23%) were lower than in rainfed fields in the region, while those in mango fields were large (70 and 66%). Fertilization in beans and grapes increased soil P and K stocks. Knowledge of stock changes allows proper system management to reduce the negative impacts of land-use change and promote sustainable production.
• 

  Soil and vegetation carbon stocks after land-use changes in a seasonally dry tropical forest

  The lack of robust scientific data still hinders estimates of soil and plant carbon (C) losses due to land-use changes in most dry tropical ecosystems. The present study investigated the effects of land-use and cover changes on total ecosystem C stocks in NE Brazil, aiming to quantify C losses after the removal of the native forest, known as Caatinga. The sampling design included the four main land-use/cover types (Dense Caatinga, Open Caatinga, Pastures and Crop fields) and the seven main soil classes (Arenosols, Acrisols, Regosols, Ferrasols, Luvisols, Planosols, and Leptosols), a combination that represents over 90% of the region. This design resulted in 192 sampling points (48 in each land-use), distributed proportionally to the area of occurrence of each soil class. In each sampling point, we determined C stocks in soil organic matter (SOM) and roots (to a depth of 1 m or rock layer), aboveground vegetation biomass (trees and herbs, separately), deadwood, and surface litter. Areas covered by Dense Caatinga store, on average, nearly 125 Mg ha−1 of C. Most of this C is stored in the soil organic matter (72.1%), followed by aboveground biomass (15.9%), belowground biomass (7.3%), deadwood (2.9%), litter (1.3%), and herbaceous biomass (0.5%). The substitution of Dense Caatinga to plant pastures and crop fields caused losses of >50% of ecosystem C stocks, reaching almost 65 Mg ha−1 of C, with nearly equal losses from the SOM and vegetation biomass compartments. Open Caatinga store nearly 30% less C than Dense Caatinga. Contrary to what was expected, the overall differences in C stocks between soil classes were not significant, with a few exceptions. We expect that the findings of this study will contribute to a more robust inventory of GHG emissions/removals due to land-use changes in NE Brazil and other dry tropical regions of the globe.